<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Why Shouldn&#8217;t I Build My Site in Flash?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.simplewebtoolbox.com/why-shouldnt-i-build-my-site-in-flash/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.simplewebtoolbox.com/why-shouldnt-i-build-my-site-in-flash/</link>
	<description>tools, tutorials &#38; strategy to simplify your online efforts</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 11 Jan 2012 12:38:33 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
<xhtml:meta xmlns:xhtml="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml" name="robots" content="noindex" />
	<item>
		<title>By: Robert Bravery</title>
		<link>http://www.simplewebtoolbox.com/why-shouldnt-i-build-my-site-in-flash/comment-page-1/#comment-7</link>
		<dc:creator>Robert Bravery</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 23 Jun 2009 19:27:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://landauclients.com/simpleweb/?p=31#comment-7</guid>
		<description>Bonnie,&lt;br /&gt;I am a great believer in this. Fancy flash sites are just that, they&#039;re fancy, but difficult to find. I just lost a customer to another designer. He redid the site in flash. &lt;br /&gt;Must admit it does look snazy, flashy, and great. Does all sorts of cool things.&lt;br /&gt;But two problems.&lt;br /&gt;1 You can&#039;t find the site on Google or any of the search engines. So what&#039;s the point of the website.&lt;br /&gt;2 If he needs any updates or changes, he has to pay some flash developer to do it. mmm Very expensive route.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;But like you say, it does not mean you should not use flash at all. Everything in moderation and for a given purpose.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;I think of flash websites the same way as I think of creating an entire website as a jpeg image map file. You wouldn&#039;t think of doing that, would you?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Bonnie,<br />I am a great believer in this. Fancy flash sites are just that, they&#39;re fancy, but difficult to find. I just lost a customer to another designer. He redid the site in flash. <br />Must admit it does look snazy, flashy, and great. Does all sorts of cool things.<br />But two problems.<br />1 You can&#39;t find the site on Google or any of the search engines. So what&#39;s the point of the website.<br />2 If he needs any updates or changes, he has to pay some flash developer to do it. mmm Very expensive route.</p>
<p>But like you say, it does not mean you should not use flash at all. Everything in moderation and for a given purpose.</p>
<p>I think of flash websites the same way as I think of creating an entire website as a jpeg image map file. You wouldn&#39;t think of doing that, would you?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

